Mental health provision is a general concern across all of higher education, often taking centre stage in political and higher education sector debates, both in the UK and beyond. The World Health Organisation has highlighted the lack of resources. Universities are under increased pressure from the government, media and public to enhance their performance in this area. So what can Universities do?
In this briefing note, we summarise the main debates in this area, highlight emerging trends of good practice (while including our own critical view), and illustrate some of the main problems within the topic. In the absence of a national framework, we will try to identify emerging trends, and to provide insights into the complex debates.
Data is at the heart of the Office for Students’ (OfS) new regulatory framework. In November 2018 they published their strategy, which describes their intentions for collection, management and use of data from providers to support their regulatory responsibilities and become a fully evidence-based regulator. In this briefing note we discuss this strategy, and any arising questions.
On 29 January, we hosted an event with Steve Butcher who is currently Head of Procurement and Efficiency at the Office for Students (OfS). The session was intended to provide an update on the future of accountability, governance, value for money and data in the sector. In this article are some notes from this session.
Last week, the most recent guidance on REF2021 was published, including guidance on submissions, panel criteria, and a template for codes of practice. This offers significant clarity and detail about the next REF and in doing so has caused waves amongst the academic community principally because providers may submit returns for staff that have been made redundant.
The Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors has surveyed company executives with responsibility for risk across Europe (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the UK and Ireland) to assess where they expect risk efforts to focus in the forthcoming year and further into the future. This survey included a wide range of sectors beyond education and provides a tool for internal audit and audit committees to horizon scan. It follows a similar exercise undertaken last year.
Cyber security continues to be the single biggest risk. New risks to emerge and / or with increasing emphasis over the last year, include those relating to inequality in the workplace and all types of discrimination. Similarly, there is more focus on social media – but recognising that there are significant opportunities as well as risks to manage. Inevitably, Brexit and global / international relations flow through a number of the areas – whether in relation to suppliers, trade restrictions or political uncertainty.
Following a similar exercise last year, we have completed a desk top review of risk registers (across all our members and clients). Unsurprisingly, the results show similar themes across most institutions. Of course, the breadth, scale and diverse nature of institutions, from Russell Group members through to small specialist providers, causes individual risks to play out differently.
These days it seems as though we talk of little else. If the volume of debate about value for money can be taken as a measure of success, the Office for Students, which has student value for money as one of its core objectives, may certainly take a bow.
So far, though, discussions have often generated more heat than light, and moreover it seems like those outside of the sector are making the running. This potentially places individual institutions on the back foot in their dealings whether with student stakeholders or with the Office for Students. It is also potentially dangerous for the sector as a whole in the context of the Post-18 Review of Education and Funding.
Effective stewardship over information and communication technology ensures expected benefits are delivered, risks are managed and technological strategy goes in the right direction. It’s crucial but often overlooked, misunderstood or badly executed. This can result in problems particularly – from our experience – in the higher education sector.
Late in 2017, the Institutes of Internal Audit across Europe (UK and Ireland, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland) pooled their resources to identify common themes or hot topics that could help to focus the attention of internal audit in its efforts to mitigate risk and add value in organisations. The exercise included a wide range of sectors – construction / infrastructure, financial services, IT, manufacturing, public sector, retail / consumer, telecoms and utilities / energy.
This briefing note sets out the main risks from that exercise, along with our comments on what it might mean for Higher Education, with the intention of aiding the development or update to internal audit plans over the coming twelve months.